Comments on: regexps in PHP, again http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/2006/12/regexps-in-php-again/ Programming for Mac and Web Thu, 04 Aug 2011 07:10:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Function ereg() is deprecated possible fix | Gameblog.me http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/2006/12/regexps-in-php-again/comment-page-1/#comment-81200 Function ereg() is deprecated possible fix | Gameblog.me Sat, 02 Apr 2011 18:45:56 +0000 http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/?p=27#comment-81200 [...] which is the recommended replacement for ereg() (see point 1 above). This author actually did a speed test for mb_ereg() function versus the preg_match(). So… *Shrugs*. The replacement / fix worked for us [...] [...] which is the recommended replacement for ereg() (see point 1 above). This author actually did a speed test for mb_ereg() function versus the preg_match(). So… *Shrugs*. The replacement / fix worked for us [...]

]]> By: indeyets http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/2006/12/regexps-in-php-again/comment-page-1/#comment-568 indeyets Thu, 07 Dec 2006 08:21:45 +0000 http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/?p=27#comment-568 unfortunately, I did see CMS's (not too spherical, by the way) which used regexps a lot. and: a) they applied those to larger texts b) they had a lot regexps to apply p.s. probably I should make more real-life comparison, though unfortunately, I did see CMS’s (not too spherical, by the way) which used regexps a lot. and:

a) they applied those to larger texts
b) they had a lot regexps to apply

p.s. probably I should make more real-life comparison, though

]]> By: hex http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/2006/12/regexps-in-php-again/comment-page-1/#comment-565 hex Wed, 06 Dec 2006 21:00:37 +0000 http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/?p=27#comment-565 1. I strongly doubt that any serious application (i.e., not a spherical CMS in vacuum) uses RE that often; a hundred of calls I can imagine, but not thousands of hundreds. This takes the comparison to a different degree: 0.019 vs 0.0012, which is not as significant as... 2. Does it not depend on an extension which is not necessarily loaded? I've seen hosters without mbstring. 1. I strongly doubt that any serious application (i.e., not a spherical CMS in vacuum) uses RE that often; a hundred of calls I can imagine, but not thousands of hundreds. This takes the comparison to a different degree: 0.019 vs 0.0012, which is not as significant as…

2. Does it not depend on an extension which is not necessarily loaded? I’ve seen hosters without mbstring.

]]>